Transfer Teacher Mentorship and Retention Grants to MDE – Takeaways from the 2026-27 Minnesota Governor’s Biennial Budget

This proposal moves teacher mentorship grants to MDE to improve coordination and support—without changing funding or program purpose.

What’s changing:
Move the Teacher Mentorship and Retention of Effective Teachers grant program from PELSB to the Minnesota Department of Education (MDE).

Cost:

  • No new spending
  • No cuts
  • Budget-neutral
    The existing $4.5 million per year stays the same—only the administering agency changes.

Why this change is proposed:

  • Mentoring and induction are proven to improve teacher retention and effectiveness, especially for new teachers.
  • MDE has recently:
    • Built a statewide teacher induction framework
    • Piloted mentoring programs in districts and charters
    • Provided statewide training and technical assistance
  • Because MDE already runs induction and workforce pipeline efforts, it is better positioned to manage mentoring grants than PELSB.

What improves under this proposal:

  • Stronger program oversight and support for grantees
  • Better alignment with teacher workforce development efforts
  • More consistent implementation of mentoring and induction statewide
  • Reduced fragmentation across agencies

Staffing change:

  • 0.8 FTE transfers from PELSB to MDE to maintain continuity and expertise.

What the grants support:

  • Mentors’ stipends
  • Induction and orientation programs for new teachers
  • Affinity groups for teachers of color and American Indian teachers
  • Professional development tied to closing achievement gaps
  • Graduate coursework and additional licensure support

Who the program prioritizes:

  • New teachers of color
  • New American Indian teachers
  • New teachers in shortage areas

Impact on students and families:

  • Improves teacher retention in the first 3–4 years, when turnover is highest
  • Supports a stable, diverse, and effective educator workforce
  • Research shows mentoring benefits all students, especially underserved students

What does NOT change:

  • Grant eligibility
  • Program goals
  • Annual funding level
  • Focus on teacher retention and effectiveness

Bottom line:
This is an administrative consolidation, not a policy shift—placing teacher mentoring grants with the agency best equipped to support induction, retention, and workforce development.